25

SRT Input (Listen) mode to bring in as source

SRT (Secure Reliable Transport) Input (Listen) mode to bring in as source. SRT supports both output and input. Wirecast SRT Output is already in development. We'd like to gauge development priority for input/listen mode. Please include a specific use case if possible.

40replies Oldest first
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Active threads
  • Popular
  • Would be very useful for bringing in remote guests.

    Like
  • For our use cases, SRT input would be priority over output, however both would be very useful!

    Mobile production input, iOS SRT device such as the app Larix

    Like 1
  • It would be good if the received streams SRT supported:

    Like
  • The most simple argument for SRT output is getting away from RTMP, targeting CDNs or streaming providers. Wowza for instance, allows SRT ingest and everyone should prioritize SRT over RTMP getting the mix into the cloud securely and reliable.

    And I have to add. Ingesting SRT adds burden to the wirecast network (open ports). I believe the majority is streaming out of wirecast into some services in the cloud. I assume the minority is ingesting SRT into their production. Maybe Telestream has to rethink priorities.

    Like
      • CraigSModerator
      • Telestream Desktop Forum Moderator
      • CraigS
      • 6 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Jens Jarke We're doing output first. That's happening in the near future. I wanted to start the ball rolling on ingest though since we have been getting requests for that.

      Like
    • CraigS Output only is good but not enough. For example you cannot connect 2 wirecast in different location (my case) if you do not have input. I think Input is a great priority as well. You know I don't like comparison but competition is becoming aggressive and already have this feature since months...

      Like 1
      • CraigSModerator
      • Telestream Desktop Forum Moderator
      • CraigS
      • 5 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Ermanno Bonifazi I understand the need for input which is why we have this vote. I think the developers need to be pushed by user interest to make sure it's prioritized. If you have strong arguments that you think the developers may be overlooking please do fill out the form and give them an earful. Users like you can make the most persuasive case.

      Like
    • CraigS I totally agree with you but this open up another discussion: are really developer seeing our priorities or more their own agenda only? I have seen recently changes that were not necessarily needed why others that are crucial (srt, quality for audio/video in RV, and many other) where left behind... and trust me competition is coming hard from all over. Even some online tools now include great quality feature for audio/video/guest/ndi/srt. While i was more confident in ability to listen users input, more recently I was a little discouraged on the outcome from the releases.

      Like 1
      • CraigSModerator
      • Telestream Desktop Forum Moderator
      • CraigS
      • 5 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Ermanno Bonifazi They need to better understand the user's needs. They sometimes find users doing unexpected things or wanting to do things more frequently than they expect. Sometimes when looking at the competition it's not only "does x have this feature" but is the feature really being used that much. Basically, some features turn out to be niche and shouldn't be prioritized over features a broad user base needs more immediately. First-hand use cases give them a much better idea of how widely a feature may be used. Also which kind of user needs a feature can have an influence. Is a feature a "novelty" or is it in demand for the corporate user for example? 

      Like
  • I would say the most famous ingest option is with larix broadcaster App from the field. Or some enodr appliances.

    Like 3
      • CraigSModerator
      • Telestream Desktop Forum Moderator
      • CraigS
      • 6 mths ago
      • 1
      • Reported - view

      Jens Jarke Thanks. We should test with Larix then as we develop ingest.

      Like 1
    • CraigS SRT Alliance is pretty big, lots of encoders can send/receive... I target hardware on that list as a priority. The protocol is brilliant. Epiphan Pearl products are amazing, but OBS/Larix is the best way to do it for free.

      Like 1
  • Do hope we get SRT ingest as the soonest. We also have use cases for both actually as we're using WC for our events with 2 locations. Currently we have to settle to send to Youtube and capture that from the hub system. If we could setup point-to-point using SRT it would be huge.

    Like 2
      • CraigSModerator
      • Telestream Desktop Forum Moderator
      • CraigS
      • 6 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Swami Trika Output will be coming first most likely. 

      Like
    • CraigS it’s a deal breaker for us. Have to go to vMix. My team loves Wirecast too.

      Like 1
      • CraigSModerator
      • Telestream Desktop Forum Moderator
      • CraigS
      • 2 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Chris Barnett As you can see there's a fair number of requests and Telestream is part of the SRT Alliance. I can't say more than that at the moment though.

      Like
      • Dazibao
      • Dazibao
      • 1 mth ago
      • Reported - view
      Chris Barnett said:
      Have to go to vMix

      But the trouble is that vMix is not for for MacOs platforms. That why I went for Wirecast. 

      Like
  • The function of SRT input is very important, and the technical means are being updated day by day. Please do not give up your users for the commercial interests of some partners. What's more, vmix, a competitor of wirecast, has already supported this function.

    Like 2
  • With more and more field cameras turning to SRT and Zixi QoS as IP-based export platforms with bonded cellular and broadband this only makes sense to offer SRT in addition to the Telestream Rendezvous web-based platform for remote ingest into Wirecast.

    Like 1
  • Absolutely needed! For external feeds in situations like election's day, live sport like running, marathon, cycling race...

    Is it possible a return channel to remote caller?

    Like
  • Emmanuel De Donato said:
    Is it possible a return channel to remote caller?

     How would you want that to work?
    Rendezvous (which is WebRTC) sends back to guests of course.

    Like 1
  • I wouldn't wait much longer to implement SRT.  Check out the latest demo from JVC touting vMix (not to mention their own system). I love Wirecast.  I'd hate to have to jump ship!

    https://livestream.com/accounts/17503621/events/9440614

    Like 4
      • CraigSModerator
      • Telestream Desktop Forum Moderator
      • CraigS
      • 3 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Bernard Clinch I'll let the powers that be know.

      Like
      • CraigSModerator
      • Telestream Desktop Forum Moderator
      • CraigS
      • 3 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Bernard Clinch As previously noted Output is already in development (and in Wirecast beta 14.1 right now) how would you use LISTEN mode specifically?

      Like
    • CraigS   Utilizing a JVC GY-HC550, I would have higher quality, more stable input into Wirecast from location sources. Why?  Rendezvous, however handy, is, at times, subject to pixelation.  

      Like
      • CraigSModerator
      • Telestream Desktop Forum Moderator
      • CraigS
      • 3 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Bernard Clinch Thanks for the explanation.

      Like
      • Dazibao
      • Dazibao
      • 1 mth ago
      • Reported - view

      Bernard Clinch Rendezvous is based on WebRTC. I am not sure about that : I recall reading that it is using flash that is since a while obsolete. Am I right ? 

      I really wonder what is the future of Rendezvous in front of the fantastic direction offered with SRT ? 

      CraigS said:
      The developers have good reason to listen given the requests and participating in the SRT Alliance.

      The competition seems fierce. I read so many comments/requests/explanations/needs of people looking for working input SRT solution again since months.

      Like
  • Larix Broadcaster has introduced in the last update Talkback feature!

    There is an SDK!

    https://softvelum.com/larix/talkback/

    Like
  • Internal Reference for SRT Ingest WIRE-17520

    Like 1
  • Please also develop SRT input. The only reason I would move away from Wirecast is because of lack of SRT input. 

    Like 1
      • CraigSModerator
      • Telestream Desktop Forum Moderator
      • CraigS
      • 2 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Chris Barnett The developers have good reason to listen given the requests and participating in the SRT Alliance.

      Like
  • Few debates are heating up CraigS .. both in Rendevous, than Wirecast than SRT, some very good feedback and proposal were pushed by the user base and none (none) realized, but "the power" (as you call it) or "the developers" seems to follow only on their own agenda (putting wheels and changing existing features only for aesthetic) or introducing CPU overload and instability: that do not seems a winning plan, my dear...Signed: another user waiting for alternative to leave.

    Like 1
      • CraigSModerator
      • Telestream Desktop Forum Moderator
      • CraigS
      • 1 mth ago
      • Reported - view

      Ermanno Bonifazi Work on SRT is being done. There's also work we do that other developers don't have to given that Wirecast is cross-platform. We also pay attention to user interface and that's often an important decision when choosing a streaming appliance. For some businesses that a deciding factor.

      Like
Vote25 Follow
  • 25 Votes
  • 1 mth agoLast active
  • 40Replies
  • 495Views
  • 13 Following