Desktop Presenter vs NDI

Please pardon my ignorance but when would you use DTP vs now the new I/O NDI protocol that 7.6/7.7 now supports?

Thanks!

NM

6replies Oldest first
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Active threads
  • Popular
  • I don't think you would. NDI seems superior to me in every way thus far.

    Reply Like 1
  • It may be an ease of use decision but ultimately NDI may be the way forward. 
    You may want to do a direct comparison to get a feel for the differences.

    Reply Like 1
  • Thanks Adam and CraigS for the quick replies.

    So, it seems like NDI is truly a faster, lower latency, overall better option to bring in not only Presentation Computers w/ PowerPoint / Keynote Slides, but Skype / Video Chat computers, or networked camera feeds, etc?

    I assume it handles audio and video and keeps them in sync too?

    Will definitely have to test.

    Reply Like
  • Nathan Mitchiner Do test and compare and even post back your first hand experience.

    Reply Like
  • I tested desktop presenter and NDI in a short test.   NDI worked very fast and stable. DTP had issues when I started changing the IP address.   The added value of NDI is (1) In the sources menu of wirecast 9, you find the broadcasting PC/MAC directly so no IP must be typed, and (2) I guess that this means that the PC/MAC can change IP address and the NDI source would remain OK. 

    Reply Like
  • Kristof Danckaert Thanks for reporting that. I think NDI has significant development push industry wide.

    Reply Like
reply to topic
Like Follow
  • 2 mths agoLast active
  • 6Replies
  • 492Views
  • 6 Following